Czech J. Food Sci., X:X | DOI: 10.17221/61/2025-CJFS

Evaluation of differences in the quality of pork meat from Czech pig breeds based on nutritional value, energy value and amino acid scoreOriginal Paper

Pavel Nevrkla1, Eva Weisbauerová2, Svitlana Karvan ORCID...2, Jan Sečkář1, Zdeněk Hadaš1, Miroslav Rozkot2, Drahomíra Čtvrtlíková Knitlová1
1 Department of Animal Breeding, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
2 Department of Pig Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Prague, Czech Republic

The nutritional quality of meat from pigs of the indigenous Prestice Black-Pied pig (PB) and the three-breed commercial hybrid of Large White × Landrace × Large Whitesireline (CH) was compared using these indicators: content of intramuscular fat, protein, saturated fatty acids (SFA) and essential amino acids (EAAs). The protein content and energy value of PB and CH meat were 20.12% and 22.56%, and 426.77 kJ·(100 g)–1 and 443.01 kJ·(100 g)–1, respectively. The lowest fat content (1.33%) and SFA content (0.33%) were found in the meat of commercial hybrid pigs. Leucine and lysine were the most predominant EAAs detected. Valine and leucine are the limiting AAs in studied meat as a protein source for children at 0.5–2 years of age. The compositions of AAs in PB and CH pork fully meet the protein needs of children over 2 years of age and adults. The calculated amount of pork meat provides the required daily intake of AAs and ensures 5–8% energy for children and 8–11% energy for adults at moderate physical activity. In general, the meat of Prestice Black-Pied pig and of the commercial hybrid showed the high nutritional value and quality and it can be recommended for consumption in the diet by children and adults.

Keywords: meat nutrients; protein quality; amino acids; pork consumption

Received: April 22, 2025; Revised: August 6, 2025; Accepted: August 8, 2025; Prepublished online: December 18, 2025 

Download citation

References

  1. Boye J., Wijesinha-Bettoni R., Burlingame B. (2012): Protein quality evaluation twenty years after the introduction of the protein digestibility corrected amino acid score method. The British Journal of Nutrition, 108: S183-S211. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Datlow L.Y., Leventhal M., King J., Wallace T.C. (2023): Consumption patterns and the nutritional contribution of total, processed, fresh, and fresh-lean pork to the U.S. diet. Nutrients, 15: 2595. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Dostálová A., Koucký M., Vališ L., Šimečková M. (2012): Evaluation of fattening performance, carcass traits and meat characteristics of Prestice Black-Pied pigs in the organic free- range and conventional system. Research in Pig Breeding, 6: 15-19.
  4. Drewnowski A. (2024): Perspective: The place of pork meat in sustainable healthy diets. Advances in Nutrition, 15: 100213. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. European Commission (2025): Food-Based Dietary Guidelines Recommendations for Meat. Available at https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/health-promotion-knowledge-gateway/food-based-dietary-guidelines-europe-table-8_en (accessed March 20, 2025).
  6. Gil Á., Martinez de Victoria E., Olza J. (2015): Indicators for the evaluation of diet quality. Nutrición Hospitalaria, 31: 128-144.
  7. Górska-Warsewicz H., Laskowski W., Kulykovets O., Kudlińska-Chylak A., Czeczotko M., Rejman K. (2018): Food products as sources of protein and amino acids - The case of Poland. Nutrients, 10: 1977. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Harrison M.R., Palma G., Buendia T., Bueno-Tarodo M., Quell D., Hachem F. (2022): A scoping review of indicators for sustainable healthy diets. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5: 822263. Go to original source...
  9. Kowalczyk M., Kaliniak-Dziura A., Prasow M., Domaradzki P., Litwińczuk A. (2022): Meat quality - Genetic background and methods of its analysis. Czech Journal of Food Science, 40: 15-25. Go to original source...
  10. Lebedová N., Needham T., Čítek J., Okrouhlá M., Zadinová K., Pokorná K., Stupka R. (2020): Comparison of two muscle fibre staining techniques and their relation to pork quality traits. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 65: 193-204. Go to original source...
  11. Leroy F., Smith N.W., Adesogan A.T., Beal T., Iannotti L., Moughan P.J., Mann N. (2023): The role of meat in the human diet: Evolutionary aspects and nutritional value. Animal Frontiers, 13: 11-18. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Lin Q., Diao S., Chen X., Du J., Wu J., Zhang X., Liu X., Li J., Zhang Z. (2024): Evaluation of the breed composition of pork via population structure analysis in pigs. Animals, 14: 3489. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Li Y.X., Cabling M.M., Kang H.S., Kim T.S., Yeom S.C., Sohn Y.G., Kim S.H., Nam K.C., Seo K.S. (2013): Comparison and correlation analysis of different swine breeds meat quality. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 26: 905-910. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Matoušek V., Kernerová N., Hyšplerová K., Jirotková D., Brzaková M. (2016): Carcass traits and meat quality of Prestice Black-Pied pig breed. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 29: 1181-1187. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Millward D.J. (2012): Identifying recommended dietary allowances for protein and amino acids: A critique of the 2007 WHO/FAO/UNU report. British Journal of Nutrition, 108: S3-S21. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Montagnese C., Santarpia L., Buonifacio M., Nardelli A., Caldara A.R., Silvestri E., Contaldo F., Pasanisi F. (2015): European food-based dietary guidelines: A comparison and update. Nutrition, 31: 908-915. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Nevrkla P., Weisbauerová E., Horký P., Hadaš Z., Rozkot M., Čtvrtlíková Knitlová D. (2023): Fatty acid and amino acid profiles in muscle longissimus lumborum et thoracis of the indigenous Prestice Black-Pied pig breed in comparison with a commercial pig hybrid. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 22: 472-481. Go to original source...
  18. OECD/FAO (2024): OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2024-2033. Paris, OECD. Available at https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-fao-agricultural-outlook-2024-2033_4c5d2cfb-en.html (accessed Aug 1, 2024).
  19. Okrouhlá M., Stupka R., Čítek J., Šprysl M., Kluzáková E, Trnka M., Štolc L. (2006): Amino acid composition of pig meat in relation to live weight and sex. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 51: 529-534. Go to original source...
  20. Okrouhlá M., Stupka R., Čítek J., Šprysl M., Trnka M., Kluzáková E. (2008): Effect of lean meat proportion on the chemical composition of pork. Czech Journal of Food Science, 26: 464-469. Go to original source...
  21. Pandey S., Kim S., Kim E.S., Keum G.B., Doo H., Kwak J., Ryu S., Choi Y., Kang J., Kim H., Chae Y., Seol K.-H., Kang S.M., Kim Y., Seong P.N., Bae I.-S., Cho S.-H., Jung S., Kim H.B. (2024): Exploring the multifaceted factors affecting pork meat quality. Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 66: 863-875. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Penkert L.P., Li R., Huang J., Gurcan A., Chung M.C., Wallace T.C. (2021): Pork consumption and its relationship to human nutrition and health: A scoping review. Meat and Muscle Biology, 5: 43. Go to original source...
  23. FAO & IAEA (2024): Development of a Protein Database and the Way Forward for Reviewing Protein Requirements. Report of a joint FAO/IAEA Technical Meeting in Vienna, Oct 10-13, 2022. Rome, FAO.
  24. Joint FAO/WHO/UNU expert consultation (2007): Protein and Amino Acid Requirements in Human Nutrition. WHO Technical Report Series, 935.
  25. FAO (2003): Food Energy - Methods of Analysis and Conversion Factors. Report of a Technical Workshop in Rome, Dec 3-6, 2002. Rome, FAO.
  26. Rosenvold K., Andersen H.J. (2003): Factors of significance for pork quality - A review. Meat Science, 64: 219-237. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Sarmiento-García A., Vieira-Aller C. (2023): Improving fatty acid profile in native breed pigs using dietary strategies: A review. Animals, 13: 1696. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Schwingshackl L., Bogensberger B., Hoffmann G. (2018): Diet quality as assessed by the healthy eating index, alternate healthy eating index, dietary approaches to stop hypertension score, and health outcomes: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 118: 74-100.e11. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Siemiński G., Skałecki P., Florek M., Domaradzki P., Poleszak E., Dmoch M., Ryszkowska-Siwko M., Kędzierska-Matysek M., Teter A., Kowalczyk M., Kaliniak-Dziura A. (2023): Meat nutritional value of Puławska Fattening Pigs, Polish Large White × Puławska crossbreeds and hybrids of DanBred. Animals, 13: 2408. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. WHO (2023a): Saturated Fatty Acid and trans-fatty Acid Intake for Adults and Children: WHO Guideline. Geneva, World Health Organization.
  31. WHO (2023b): Total Fat Intake for the Prevention of Unhealthy Weight Gain in Adults and Children: WHO Guideline. Geneva, World Health Organization.
  32. Tu W., Wang H., Zhang Y., Jiang W., He C., Huang J., Bai L., Diao Y., Zhou J., Tan Y., Wu X. (2025): Muscle characteristics comparison analysis reveal differences in the meat quality and nutritional components of three Shanghai local pig breeds. Foods, 14: 569. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  33. Verger E., Le Port A., Borderon A., Bourbon G., Moursi M., Savy M., Mariotti F., Martin-Prével Y. (2021): Dietary diversity indicators and their associations with dietary adequacy and health outcomes: A systematic scoping review. Advances in Nutrition, 12: 1659-1672. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. Wolfe R.R., Baum J.I., Starck C., Moughan P.J. (2018): Factors contributing to the selection of dietary protein food sources. Clinical Nutrition, 37: 130-138. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. Zduńczyk W., Tkacz K., Pietrzak-Fiećko R., Bottari B., Modzelewska-Kapituła M. (2024): Pork as a source of nutrients in a human diet - Comparison of meat obtained from conventional and organic systems offered in the Polish market. NFS Journal, 37: 100199. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.