Czech J. Food Sci., 2022, 40(5):375-382 | DOI: 10.17221/100/2021-CJFS

Detection of soy in food from the Czech market using ELISA and PCR methodsOriginal Paper

Kamila Novotná Kružíková ORCID...*, Tereza Popelková, Zuzana Tšponová, Veronika Doubková, Petra Doleželová, Lucie Laichmannová
Department of Animal Protection and Welfare and Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic

Soy is considered an allergen under Regulation No. 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council, which mandates the labelling of soy allergen on food packaging. This study is focused on detecting soy in food products using two kinds of methods. The first method, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), was performed using two commercial kits (Veratox for Soy Allergen; Neogen, USA). The second method, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), was carried out with two different deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-isolating kits and DNA isolation via the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method. A total of 57 samples of food were tested, including 45 samples of animal origin and 12 samples of plant origin. The results were compared with information on the packaging. From the group of samples that contained soy according to the packaging (12 pieces), 9 samples were found to be positive by ELISA method, 10 samples by the CTAB method and 11 samples by GeneSpin. On the other hand, from the group of samples that should not contain soy according to the packaging (30 pieces), the presence of soy in 2 samples was detected by ELISA. No significant difference was found between the examined methods. Results show that the situation on the market is satisfactory and that only products declared as containing traces of soy appear to be problematic.

Keywords: allergen; processed product; product labelling; Regulation No. 1169, 2011; CTAB method

Published: October 27, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kružíková KN, Popelková T, Tšponová Z, Doubková V, Doleželová P, Laichmannová L. Detection of soy in food from the Czech market using ELISA and PCR methods. Czech J. Food Sci. 2022;40(5):375-382. doi: 10.17221/100/2021-CJFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Brychta J., Honzlová A., Bulawová H., Čurdová H., Klímová E. (2014): Results of the official monitoring of meat products in the Czech Republic. Maso, 6: 36-39.
  2. Czech Agriculture and Food Inspection Authority (2018): National Recommendations for the Provision of Information on the Possible and Unintended Presence of Substances or Products Causing Allergies or Intolerances in Food (Národní doporučení pro uvádění informací o možném a nezáměrném výskytu látek nebo produktů vyvolávajících alergie nebo nesnášenlivost v potravinách). Czech Agriculture and Food Inspection Authority (CAFIA). Available at https://www.szpi.gov.cz/clanek/narodni-doporuceni-pro-uvadeni-informaci-o-moznema-nezamernem-vyskytu-latek-nebo-produktu-vyvolavajicich-alergie-nebo-nesnasenlivost-v-potravinach.aspx (accessed Mar 12, 2021). (in Czech)
  3. DunnGalvin A., Chan C.H., Crevel R., Grimshaw K., Poms R., Schnadt S., Taylor S.L., Turner P., Allen K.J., Austin M., Baka A., Baumert J.L., Baumgartner S., Beyer K., Bucchini L., Fernández-Rivas M., Grinter K., Houben G.F., Hourihane J., Kenna F., Kruizinga A.G., Lack G., Madsen C.B., Clare Mills E.N., Papadopoulos N.G., Alldrick A., Regent L., Sherlock R., Wal J.M., Roberts G. (2015): Precautionary allergen labelling: Perspectives from key stakeholder groups. Allergy, 70: 1039-1051. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Costa A., Amaral J.S., Grazina L., Beatriz M., Oliveira P.P., Mafra I. (2016): Matrix-normalised real-time PCR approach to quantify soybean as a potential food allergen as affected by thermal processing. Food Chemistry, 221: 1843-1850. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Greiner R., Konietzny U., Villavicencio A. (2005): Qualitative and quantitative detection of genetically modified maize and soybean in processed foods sold commercially in Brazil by PCR-based methods. Food Control, 16: 753-759. Go to original source...
  6. Jankovic V., Matekalo-Sveraka V., Lakicevic B., Spiric D., Petronijevic R. (2015): Soybean and gluten in meat products - Consumer protection strategy. The 58th International Meat Industry Conference (MeatCon 2015). Procedia Food Science, 5: 121-124. Go to original source...
  7. Jasbeer K., Son R., Mohamad Ghazali F., Cheah Y.K. (2010): Real-time PCR evaluation of seven DNA extraction methods for the purpose of GMO analysis. International Food Research Journal, 16: 329-341.
  8. Leitner A., Castro-Rubio F., Marina M.L., Lindner W. (2006): Identification of marker proteins for the adulteration of meat products with soybean proteins by multidimensional liquid chromatography - Tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Proteome Research, 5: 2424-2430. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Mafra I., Silva S.A., Moreira E.J.M.O., Ferreira da Silva C.S., Beatriz M., Oliveira P.P. (2008): Comparative study of DNA extraction methods for soybean derived food products. Food Control, 19: 1183-1190. Go to original source...
  10. Mills E.N., Mackie A.R., Burney P., Beyer K., Frewer L., Madsen C., Botjes E., Crevel R.W.R., Van Ree R. (2007): The prevalence, cost and basis of food allergy across Europe. Allergy, 62: 717-722. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Padua P., Moreirab A., Moreiraa P., Melo de Vasconcelose F., Barrosa R. (2019): Impact of the regulation (EU) 1169/2011: Allergen-related recalls in the rapid alert system for food and feed (RASFF) portal. Food Control, 98: 389-398. Go to original source...
  12. Planque M., Arnould T., Dieu M., Delahaut P., Renard P., Gillard N. (2016): Advances in ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry for sensitive detection of several foodallergens in complex and processed foodstuffs. Journal of Chromatography A, 1464: 115-123. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Poms R.E., Klein C.L., Anklam E. (2004): Methods for allergen analysis in food: A review. Food Additives and Contaminants Part A - Chemistry Analysis Control Exposure & Risk Assessment, 21: 1-31. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Pospiech M., Tremlová B., Renčová E., Randulová Z., Lukášková Z., Pokorná J. (2011): Comparison of the results of the ELISA, histochemical and immunohistochemicals detection of soya proteins in meat products. Czech Journal of Food Sciences, 29: 471-479. Go to original source...
  15. Soares S., Amaral J.S., Beatri M., Oliveira P.P., Mafra I. (2014): Quantitative detection of soybean in meat products by a TaqMan real-time PCR assay. Meat Science, 98: 41-46. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Sovová T., Křížová B., Kučera L., Ovesná J. (2020): Detecting soybean and milk in dairy and soy products with post-PCR high resolution melting assays. Czech Journal of Food Sciences, 38: 209-214. Go to original source...
  17. Scharf A., Kasel U., Wichmann G., Besler M. (2013): Performance of ELISA and PCR methods for the determinination of allergens in food: An evaluation of six years of proficiency testing for soy (Glycine max L.) and wheat gluten (Triticum aesivum L.). Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 61: 10261-10272. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Stefanova P., Taseva M., Georgieva T., Gotcheva V., Angelov A. (2013): A modified CTAB method for DNA extraction from soybean and meat products. Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment, 27: 3803-3810. Go to original source...
  19. Renčová E., Tremlová B. (2009): ELISA for detection of soy protein in meat products. Acta Veterinaria Brno, 78: 667-671. Go to original source...
  20. Rudy W., Dreusch A.B. (2009): Problems, detection and new possibilities for the analysis of hidden food allergens (Problematik, Nachweis und neue Möglichkeiten für die analyse versteckter Lebensmittelallergene). Journal für Verbraucherschutz Lebensmittelsicherheit, 4: 13-18. (in German) Go to original source...
  21. ThermoScientific (2019): T042-Technical Bulletin: NanoDrop Spectrophotometers. Available at https://dna.uga.edu/wpcontent/uploads/sites/51/2019/02/Note-on-the-260_280and-260_230-Ratios.pdf (accessed Mar 12, 2021).

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.