Czech J. Food Sci., 2019, 37(1):62-68 | DOI: 10.17221/331/2017-CJFS

Nutritional and technological properties of Tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius) cultivated in Mexican NortheastFood Technology and Economy, Engineering and Physical Properties

Laura Heredia-Rodríguez1, Marcela Gaytán-Martínez2, Eduardo Morales-Sánchez3, Aurora de Jesús Garza-Juárez1, Vania Urias-Orona1, Blanca Edelia González-Martínez1, Manuel López-Cabanillas Lomelí1, Jesús Alberto Vázquez-Rodríguez1,*
1 Research Center in Nutrition and Public Health, Public Health and Nutrition Faculty, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Mexico
2 Research and Graduate Studies in Food Science, School of Chemistry, Universidad Autónomade Querétaro, Querétaro, Mexico
3 CICATA-IPN, Queretaro Unit, Instituto Politenico Nacional, Querétaro, Mexico

The nutritional, cooking and technological properties of the Tepary bean (TB) cultivated in Mexican northeast comparing to two common beans varieties (Pinto Americano and Black Jamapa) were evaluated in this study. Nutritional parameters evaluated of TB resulted significantly different from common beans varieties analysed, except lipid fraction. Cooking times of soaked (4 and 8 h) and non-soaked varieties varied significantly; TB shows between 55.1-80.49 min by cooking time. The textural profile analysis (TPA) of TB showed a significant reduction of hardness, chewiness and adhesiveness in soaked compared to non-soaked. In addition, TB presented a similar behaviour to Pinto Americano in TPA non-soaked and cooked and soaked 8h and cooked, except to adhesiveness. Technological properties of TB and resistant and non-resistant starch content showed significant differences between species. Due to, TB has nutritional, cooking and technological properties comparable to other edible legumes as common bean, mainly Pinto Americano variety.

Keywords: ethnical crops; legumes; technological properties; texture profile analysis

Published: February 28, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Heredia-Rodríguez L, Gaytán-Martínez M, Morales-Sánchez E, Garza-Juárez ADJ, Urias-Orona V, González-Martínez BE, et al.. Nutritional and technological properties of Tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius) cultivated in Mexican Northeast. Czech J. Food Sci. 2019;37(1):62-68. doi: 10.17221/331/2017-CJFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Acosta-Díaz E., Hernández-Torres I., Amador-Ramírez M.D., Padilla-Ramírez J.S., Zavala-García F. (2014): Las especies silvestres de Phaseolus (Fabaceae) en Nuevo León, México. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 8: 1459-1465. Go to original source...
    2. Adebowale K., Lawal O. (2004): Comparative study of the functional properties of bambarra groundnut (Voandzeia subterranean) jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis) and Mucuna bean (Mucuna pruriens) flours. Food Research International, 37: 355-365. Go to original source...
    3. Elías L.G., García-Soto A., Bressani R. (1986): Métodos para establecer la calidad tecnológica y nutricional del frijol. Guatemala, C.A.: Ins. De Nutrición de Centro América y Panamá (INCAP).
    4. González R., Llano J., Medina L.A., y Castellanos E. (1992): Chemical composition in seeds of Phaseolus vulgaris, Phaseolus acutifolius and Vigna unguiculata grown under water stress conditions. National Agricultural Library, 69-70.
    5. Hamid S., Muzaffar S., Wani I.A., Masoodi F.A., Bhat M.M. (2014): Physical and cooking characteristics of two cowpea cultivars grown in temperate Indian climate. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 4. doi: 10.1016/j.jssas.2014.08.002 Go to original source...
    6. Jenkins D.J.A., Thorne M.J., Camelon K., Jenkins A.L., Rao A.V., Taylor R.H., Francis T. (1982): Effect of processing in digestibility and the blood glucose response: study of lentils. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 36: 1093-1101. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Jiménez-Galindo J.C., Acosta-Gallegos J.A. (2012): Caracterización de genotipos criollos de frijol Tepari (Phaseolus acutifolius A. Gray) y común (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) https://doi.org/10.17221/331/2017-CJFS bajo temporal. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 3: 1565-1577. Go to original source...
    8. Julianti E., Rusmarilin H., Yusraini E. (2015): Functional and rheological properties of composite flour from sweet potato, maize, soybean, and xanthan gum. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 30: 1-7.
    9. Kaur M., Singh N. (2006): Relationships between selected properties of seeds, flours, and starches from different chickpea cultivars. International Journal of Food Properties, 9: 597-608. Go to original source...
    10. Kaur M., Singh N. (2007): Comparison between the properties of seed, starch, flour and protein separated from chemically hardened and normal kidney beans. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 87: 729-737. Go to original source...
    11. Marsh L.E., Davis D.W. (1985): Influence of high temperature on the performance of some Phaseolus species at different development stages. Euphytica, 34: 431-439. Go to original source...
    12. McCleary B.V. (2002): Measurement of resistant starch by enzymatic digestion in starch and selected plant materials: collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International, 85: 1103-1111. Go to original source...
    13. Mederos Y. (2006): Indicadores de la calidad en el grano de frijol (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Cultivos Tropicales, 27: 55-62.
    14. Mudryj A.N., Yu N., Aukema H.M. (2014): Nutritional and health benefits of pulses. Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism, 39: 1197-1204. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    15. Muller F.M. (1967): Cooking quality of pulses. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 18: 292-295. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    16. Parsons L.R., Howe T.K. (1984): Effects of water stress on the water relations of Phaseolus vulgaris and the drought resistant Phaseolus acutifolius. Plant physiology, 60: 197-202. Go to original source...
    17. Ramírez-Jiménez A.K., Reynoso-Camacho R., MendozaDíaz S., Loarca-Piña G. (2014): Functional and technological potential of dehydrated Phsaseolus vulgaris L. flours. Food Chemistry, 161: 254-260. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    18. Sánchez-Arteaga H.M., Urías-Silvas J.E., Espinosa-Andrews H., García-Márquez E. (2015): Effect of chemical composition and thermal properties on the cooking quality of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). CyTA-Journal of Food, 13: 385-391. Go to original source...
    19. Sefa-Dedeh S., Stanley D.W. (1979a): The relationship of microstructure of cowpeas to water absorption and dehulling properties. Cereal Chemistry, 56: 379-386.
    20. Sefa-Dedeh S., Stanley D.W. (1979b): Textural implications of the microstructure of legumes. Food Technology, 33: 77-83.
    21. Shimelis E.A., Rakshit S.K. (2005): Proximate composition and physico-chemical properties of improved dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties grown in Ethiopia. LWTFood Science and Technology, 38: 331-338. Go to original source...
    22. Silva-Cristobal L., Osorio-Díaz P., Tovar J., Bello-Pérez L.A. (2010): Chemical composition, carbohydrate digestibility, and antioxidant capacity of cooked black beam, chickpea, and lentil Mexican varieties. CyTA-Journal of Food, 8: 7-14. Go to original source...
    23. Szczesniak A.S. (1975): General foods texture profile revisitedten years' perspective. Journal of Texture Studies, 6: 5-8. Go to original source...
    24. Vindiola O.L., Seib P.A., Hoseney R.C. (1986): Accelerated development of the hard-to-cook state in beans. Cereal Foods World, 31: 538-552.
    25. Wani I.A., Sogi D.S., Wani A.A., Gill B.S. (2015): Physical and cooking characteristics of some Indian kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 30: 1-9.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content