Czech J. Food Sci., 2015, 33(2):174-179 | DOI: 10.17221/303/2014-CJFS

Validation of hydrogen cyanide fumigation in flourmills to control the confused flour beetleFood Technology and Economy, Engineering and Physical Properties

Radek AULICKY1, Vaclav STEJSKAL1, Milan DLOUHY2, Jana LISKOVA2
1 Department of Stored Pest Control and Food Safety, Division of Crop Management System, Crop Research Institute, Prague, Czech Republic
2 Lucebni zavody Draslovka a.s. Kolín, Czech Republic

In the milling industry, the Tribolium confusum is hard to exterminate pest. We measured the concentration time product (Ct-P) achieved during the hydrogen cyanide (HCN) fumigation and examined whether the Ct-P levels in the explored Czech pilot mill were sufficient to control the field strain of T. confusum. Using an originally constructed, gastight fumigation chamber, it was estimated that the Ct-P required for the complete killing of the field strain of T. confusum was 4× higher (4.35 g/h/m3) than the levels required to kill the laboratory strain (1.25 g/h/m3). The Ct-P levels (ranging from 79 g/h/m3 to 100 g/h/m3) reached during the mill fumigations with HCN were less than half of the labelled HCN rate (240 g/h/m3). Nevertheless, the current HCN dosage is still sufficient since the Ct-P reached during the mill fumigations was at least 99× higher than that required for the exterminating to the lab strain and 18× higher than that required for the field strain extermination. These results were confirmed in mill validation testing, where 100% mortality of T. confusum adults was achieved.

Keywords: mills; food safety; pest control; insecticides; fumigant

Published: April 30, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
AULICKY R, STEJSKAL V, DLOUHY M, LISKOVA J. Validation of hydrogen cyanide fumigation in flourmills to control the confused flour beetle. Czech J. Food Sci. 2015;33(2):174-179. doi: 10.17221/303/2014-CJFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Armstrong M.T., Hill E.G. (1960): Flour mill fumigation comparison between methyl bromide and hydrogen cyanide as fumigants in a flour warehouse. Milling, 135: 234.
  2. Arthur F.H. (2012): Aerosols and contact insecticides as alternatives to methyl bromide in flour mills, food production facilities, and food warehouses. Journal of Pest Science, 85: 323-329. Go to original source...
  3. Aulický R., Stejskal V. (2015): Efficacy and limitations of phosphine "spot-fumigation" against five Coleoptera species of stored product pests in wheat in a grain store - short note. Plant Protectection Science, 51: 33-38. Go to original source...
  4. Bond E.J. (1984): Manual of Fumigation for Insect Control. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper No. 54. Roma, FAO.
  5. Campbell J.F., Arbogast R.T. (2004): Stored-product insects in a flour mill: population dynamics and response to fumigation treatments. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 112: 217-225. Go to original source...
  6. Champ B.R. (1979): Pesticide resistance and its current significance in control of pests of stored products. In: Caswell G.H., Boshoff W.H., Daramola A.M., Dina S.O., Adesuyi S.A., Singh S.R., Ivbijaro M.F., Adeyemi S.A.O., Taylor T.A. (eds): Proceedings 2nd International Working Conference on Stored-Product Entomology, Sep 10-16, 1978, Ibadan, Nigeria. Georgia, Savannah: 159-181.
  7. Chayaprasert W., Maier D.E., Subramanyam Bh., Hartzer M. (2012): Gas leakage and distribution characteristics of methyl bromide and sulfuryl fluoride during fumigations in a pilot flour mill. Journal of Stored Product Research, 50: 1-7. Go to original source...
  8. Ciesla Y., Ducom P. (2010): Efficacy against eggs of Tribolium confusum and Tribolium castaneum after fumigations with sulfuryl fluoride in flour mills. Julius-KühnArchiv, Berlin, Nr. 429: 48-51.
  9. Ducom P. (2012): Methyl bromide alternatives. In: Proceedings 9th International Controlled Atmosphere and Fumigation (CAF) in Stored Products, ARBER Professional Congress Services, Oct 15-19, 2012, Antalya, Turkey: 205-214.
  10. Gerhard P.D., Lindgren D.L. (1951): Resistance to fumigation studies of outbreak in southern California reveal resistance to hydrogen cyanide fumigation persists. California Agriculture, 35: 7-11.
  11. Gough H.C. (1939): Factors affecting the resistance of the flour beetle Tribolium confusum Duv. to hydrogen cyanide. Annals of Applied Biology, 26: 533-571. Go to original source...
  12. Kucerova Z., Kyhos K., Aulicky R., Stejskal V. (2013): Lowpressure treatment to control food-infesting pests (Tribolium castaneum, Sitophilus granarius) using a vacuum packing machine. Czech Journal of Food Sciences, 31: 94-98. Go to original source...
  13. Kucerova Z., Kyhos K., Aulicky R., Lukas J., Stejskal V. (2014): Laboratory experiments of vacuum treatment in combination with an O2 absorber for the suppression of Sitophilus granarius infestations in stored grain samples. Crop Protection, 61: 79-83. Go to original source...
  14. Lindgren D.L. Dickson R.C. (1945): Repeated fumigation with HCN and the development of resistance in the California red scale. Journal of Economic Entomology, 38: 296-299. Go to original source...
  15. Lindgren D.L., Vincent L.E. (1965): The susceptibility of laboratory-reared and field-collected cultures of Tribolium confusum and T. castaneum to ethylene dibromide, hydrocyanic acid and methyl bromide. Journal of Economic Entomology, 58: 551-555. Go to original source...
  16. MacDonald O.C., Reichmuth C. (1996): Effects on target organisms. In: Bell C.H., Price H., Chakrabarti B. (eds): The Methyl Bromide Issue. Series on Agrochemicals and Plant Protection. Vol. 1. Singapore, John Wiley & Sons: 149-189.
  17. Rambeau M., Benitez D., Dupuis S., Ducom P. (2001): Hydrogen cyanide as an immediate alternative to methyl bromide for structural fumigations. In: Donahaye J.E., Navarro S., Leesch J.G. (eds): Proceedings International Conference on Controlled Atmosphere and Fumigation in Stored Products, Fresno, USA, Oct 29-Nov 3, 2000. Clovis, Executive Printing Services: 101-111.
  18. Reichmuth C. (1999): Fumigation for pest control in stored product protection - outlook. In: Jin Z., Liang Q., Liang Y., Tan X., Guan L. (eds): Proceedings 7 th International Working Conference on Stored-Product Protection, Oct 14-19, 1998, Beijing, China. Chengdu, Sichuan Publishing House of Science and Technology, Vol. 1: 311-318.
  19. Quayle H.J. (1916): Are scale insects becoming resistant to hydrocyanic acid fumigation? California Agriculture, 3: 333-358.
  20. Quayle H.J. (1922): Resistance of certain scale insects in certain localities to hydrocyanic fumigation. Journal of Economical Entomology, 15: 400-404. Go to original source...
  21. Stejskal V. (1995): The influence of food and shelter on the efficacy of a commercial sticky trap in Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Journal of Stored Products Research, 31: 229-233. Go to original source...
  22. Stejskal V., Aulicky R. (2014): Field evidence of roof rat (Rattus rattus) faecal contamination of barley grain stored in silos in the Czech Republic. Journal of Pest Science, 87: 117-124. Go to original source...
  23. Stejskal V., Hubert J. (2008): Risk of occupational allergy to stored grain arthropods and false pest-risk perception in Czech grain stores. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, 15: 29-35.
  24. Stejskal V., Kucerova Z., Aulicky R. (2014a): A review of pest control strategies and damage potential of seed-infesting pests in the Czech stores. Plant Protection Science, 50: 165-173 Go to original source...
  25. Stejskal V., Douda O., Zouhar M., Manasova M., Dlouhy M., Simbera J., Aulicky R. (2014b): Wood penetration ability of hydrogen cyanide and its efficacy for fumigation of Anoplophora glabripennis, Hylotrupes bajulus (Coleoptera), and Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Nematoda). International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 86: 189-195. Go to original source...
  26. Trematerra P., Stejskal V., Hubert J. (2011): The monitoring of semolina contamination by insect fragments using the light filth method in an Italian mill. Food Control, 22: 1021-1026. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.