Czech J. Food Sci., 2015, 33(1):32-36 | DOI: 10.17221/233/2014-CJFS

Consumer perception of cured pork meats: the added value of the organic attributeFood Analysis, Food Quality and Nutrition

Anna GAVIGLIO, Alberto PIRANI
Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, Milano, Italy

Convenience foods, such as cured meats, have always been appreciated in terms of their price, convenience and of course their taste. The pig sector in Italy is substantially stable, and has recently been enhanced by new forms of product differentiation, such as quality certifications. We studied consumer preferences with respect to cured meats from organic farming using a Choice Experiment (CE) and Conditional Logit (CL) approach. In order to estimate consumer attitudes towards organic cured meats, we estimated the weight of externalities that such meats produce presenting them as intrinsic attributes of the product. The final aim was therefore to examine how better health, the protection of biodiversity and the reduction of pollution can affect the choices of organic versus conventional cured meats. Given the characteristics of CE, the trade-offs among these attributes and their value in terms of consumer willingness to pay (WTP) were thus estimated. The results indicate that consumers are well-disposed to organic cured meats, and are aware of the need to support livestock productions that respect the environment and animal welfare.

Keywords: choice experiment; conditional logit; consumer perception; organic pork meat

Published: February 28, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
GAVIGLIO A, PIRANI A. Consumer perception of cured pork meats: the added value of the organic attribute. Czech J. Food Sci. 2015;33(1):32-36. doi: 10.17221/233/2014-CJFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Aarset B., Beckmann S., Bigne E., Beveridge M., Bjorndal T., Bunting J., McDonagh P., Mariojouls C., Muir J., Prothero A., Reisch L., Smith A., Tveteras R., Young J. (2004): The European consumers' understanding and perceptions of the "organic" food regime: the case of aquaculture. British Food Journal, 106: 93-105. Go to original source...
  2. Adamowicz W., Louviere J., Williams M. (1994): Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26: 271-292. Go to original source...
  3. Batte M.T., Hooker N.H., Haab T.C., Beaverson J. (2007): Putting their money where their mouths are: Consumer willingness to pay for multi-ingredient, processed organic food products. Food Policy, 32: 145-159. Go to original source...
  4. Bredahl L., Grunert K.G., Fertin C. (1998): Relating consumer perceptions of pork quality to physical product characteristics. Food Quality and Preference, 9: 273-281. Go to original source...
  5. Darby K., Batte M. T., Ernst S., Roe B. (2008): Decomposing local: A conjoint analysis of locally produced foods. American Journal of Agricultural Economic, 90: 476-486. Go to original source...
  6. Durham C.A. (2007): The impact of environmental and health motivations on the organic share of produce purchases. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 36: 304-320. Go to original source...
  7. Gaviglio A. (2007): L'evoluzione delle principali determinanti di acquisto dei prodotti da agricoltura biologica. In: Zanoli R.: Sostenibilità e Qualità delle produzioni agricole biologiche. 3rd Workshop GRAB-IT, Roma, May 22, 2007. Perugia, Ali&no Editrice.
  8. Grunert K.G., Bredahl L., Brunsø K. (2004): Consumer perception of meat quality and implications for product development in the meat sector - a review. Meat Science 66: 259-272. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Hill H., Lynchehaun F. (2002): Organic milk: attitudes and consumption patterns. British Food Journal, 104: 526-542. Go to original source...
  10. Hughner R.S., McDonagh P., Prothero A., Shultz II C.S., Stanton J. (2007): Who are organic food consumers? A compilation and review of why people purchase organic food. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6: 94-110. Go to original source...
  11. Lancaster K.J. (1966): A new approach to consumer theory. The Journal of Political Economy, 74: 132-157. Go to original source...
  12. Mazzanti M. (2002): Cultural heritage as a multi-dimensional, multi-value and multi attribute economic resource. Journal of Socio Economics, 31: 529-558. Go to original source...
  13. McFadden D. (1984): Econometric analysis of qualitative response models. In: Griliches Z., Intriligator M. (eds): Handbook of Econometrics. II. Amsterdam, North Holland. Go to original source...
  14. Michaud C., Llerena D., Joly I. (2013): Willingness to pay for environmental attributes of non-food agricultural products: a real choice experiment. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 40: 313-329. Go to original source...
  15. Naspetti S., Vairo D. (2004): Cosa pensano i consumatori della carne e del latte biologico: risultati di una ricerca europea. On: Atti del IV convegno nazionale "Zootecnia biologica 4 anni dopo", Arezzo, Italy, March 26, 2004.
  16. Nitrates Directive No. 676 of the Council (91/676/EEC). Official Journal, L 375, 31/12/1991.
  17. Sali G. (2003): La valutazione delle preferenze mediante esperimenti di scelta: il contenuto ambientale dei prodotti agro-alimentari. Rivista di Economia Agraria, LVIII: 553-575.
  18. Zander K., Hamm U. (2010): Consumer preferences for additional ethical attributes of organic food. Food Quality and Preference, 21: 495-503. Go to original source...
  19. Zanoli R., Naspetti S. (2002): Consumer Motivations in the purchase of organic food: a means-end approach. British Food Journal, 104: 643-653. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.