Czech J. Food Sci., 2014, 32(2):158-163 | DOI: 10.17221/221/2013-CJFS

Effect of replacing sucrose with fructose on the physico-chemical sensory characteristics of kinnow candyOriginal Paper

Poonam Aggarwal, Mona Michael
Department of Food Science and Technology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Indie

We determine the effect of substitution of sucrose with fructose on the physico-chemical composition and sensory characteristics of kinnow candy. Candy was prepared with peel using sucrose and fructose at the ratio of 100:0, 0:100, 75:25, 50:50, and 25:75 with 70 °B of TSS. Organoleptically, the candy prepared with 100% fructose proved the best but the candy prepared with 25:75 of sucrose to fructose was equally good. The least acceptable was the candy prepared with 100% sucrose, as it had a dull appearance and slight crystallisation was observed during storage. Moisture, acidity and ascorbic acid decreased while total soluble solids, reducing and total sugars and limonin increased with no change in ash content of the candies during four months of storage.

Keywords: limonin; organoleptical characteristics; bitterness; flavour; texture

Published: April 30, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Aggarwal P, Michael M. Effect of replacing sucrose with fructose on the physico-chemical sensory characteristics of kinnow candy. Czech J. Food Sci. 2014;32(2):158-163. doi: 10.17221/221/2013-CJFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Amerine M.A., Pangborn R.M., Roessler E.B. (1965): Principles of Sensory Evaluation of Food. Academic Press, London: 5.
  2. Anonymous (2009): India: Kinnow farming attracting Punjab Farmes. Available at www.atcitrus.com
  3. Cochran W.G., Cox G.M. (1957): Experimental Designs, 24476. John Willey and Sons, Inc. New York: 95-100.
  4. Duxbury D.D. (1992): Crystalline fructose adds extra sweetness and functional versatility. Food Processing, 53: 94-95.
  5. Lal G., Siddappa G.S., Tandon G.L. (1986): Preservation of Fruit and Vegetables. Publications and Information Division, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi: 93-123.
  6. Mehta U., Bajaj S. (1984): Changes in the chemical composition and organoleptic quality of citrus peel candy during preparation and storage. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 21: 422-424.
  7. Nagar P.K. (1993): Effect of different harvesting periods on shelf life and quality of Kinnow fruits. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 30: 44-45.
  8. Ranganna S. (1995): Handbook of Analysis and Quality Control for Fruit and Vegetable Products. 2 nd Ed. Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Company, New Delhi.
  9. Rani U., Bhatia B. S. (1986): Studies on baggu gosha pear for preserve and ready to eat products. Indian Food Packer, 40: 25-31.
  10. Sharma S., Dhaliwal Y.S., Kalia M. (1998): Candied apples: A new perspective. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 35: 79-82.
  11. Siddique M.I., Ahmed M., Aziz Awan J., Rehman S.U.R., Ahmed A. (1990): Production of wax gourd candy by using high fructose syrup. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 27: 205-208.
  12. Sogi D.S., Singh S. (2001): Studies on bitterness development in Kinnow juice, ready-to-serve, squash, jam and candy. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 38: 433-438.
  13. Vaks B., Lifshitz A. (1981): Debittering of orange juice by bacteria which degrade limonin. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 29: 1258-1261. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.