Czech J. Food Sci., 2012, 30(1):9-14 | DOI: 10.17221/18/2011-CJFS

Fermentation of native wheat, potato, and pea starches, and their preparations by bifidobacterium - changes in resistant starch content

Małgorzata Wronkowska, Maria Soral-Śmietana
Department of Chemistry and Biodynamic of Food, Division of Food Science, Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Olsztyn, Poland

The capability was studied of the selected Bifidobacterium strains to utilise the resistant starch fraction (RS) from native starches of the following origin: wheat, potato, and pea, and their preparations obtained experimentally by physical and enzymatical modifications. Furthermore, the potential influence of the gelatinisation process on the degree of utilisation of RS from the investigated starch samples was studied. The following strains: B. pseudolongum KSI9, B. animalis KS20a1, and B. breve KN14, were chosen. The native starches and their preparations were characterised by their different contents of the RS fraction, which was metabolised during in vitro fermentation for Bifidobacterium growth. The highest decrease in the RS content was observed in the case of native potato and pea starches after 24-h fermentation by Bifidobacterium strains. The RS fraction of the wheat starch preparation was generally a better substrate for the selected bacteria (19-34%) in comparison with the native wheat starch (0-13%). The gelatinisation process of the native starches and their preparations had a negligible effect on the RS fraction utilised as a substrate for stimulating the growth of the Bifidobacterium strains selected.

Keywords: starch modification; in vitro fermentation; starch gelanisation

Published: February 29, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Wronkowska M, Soral-Śmietana M. Fermentation of native wheat, potato, and pea starches, and their preparations by bifidobacterium - changes in resistant starch content. Czech J. Food Sci. 2012;30(1):9-14. doi: 10.17221/18/2011-CJFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Alander M., Mättö J., Kneifel W., Johansson M., Kögler B., Crittenden R., Mattila-Sandholm T., Saarela M. (2001): Effect of galacto-oligosaccharide supplementation on human faecal microflora and on survival and persistence of Bifidobacterium lactis Bb-12 in the gastrointestinal tract. International Dairy Journal, 11: 817-825. Go to original source...
  2. Arrigoni E., Jörger F., Kollöffel B., Roulet I., Herensperger M., Meile L., Amado R. (2002): In vitro fermentability of a commercial wheat germ preparation and its impact on the growth of bifidobacteria. Food Research International, 35: 475-481. Go to original source...
  3. Champ M., Martin L., Noah L., Gratas M. (1999): Analytical methods for resistant starch. In: Sungsoo Cho S., Prosky L., Dreher M. (eds): Complex Carbohydrates in Foods. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York: 184-187.
  4. Craig S.A.S., Holden J.F., Troup J.P., Auerbach M.H., Frier H.I. (1998): Polydextrose as soluble fiber: physiological and analytical aspects. Cereal Foods World, 43: 370-376.
  5. Cummings J.H., Macfarlane G.T. (1997): Colonic microflora: nutrition and health. Nutrition, 13: 476-478. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Gibson G.R., Roberfroid M.B. (1995): Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics. Journal of Nutrition, 125: 1401-1412. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Lewandowicz G., Soral-Śmietana M., Fornal J. (1998): The way of receiving alimentary starch preparation with increased resistance to amylolytic enzymes. Polish Patent No. P.325 981.
  8. Lewandowicz G., Soral-Śmietana M. (2004): Starch modification by iterated syneresis. Carbohydrate Polymer, 56: 403-413. Go to original source...
  9. Nugent A.P. (2005): Health properties of resistant starch. Nutrition Bulletin, 30: 27-54. Go to original source...
  10. Rasic J.L.J. (1990): Culture media for detection and enumeration of the bifidobacteria in fermented milk products. IDF Bulletin, 252: 24-31.
  11. Rooney L.W., Pflugfelder R.L. (1986): Factors affecting starch digestibility with special emphasis on sorghum and corn. Journal of Animal Science, 63: 1607-1623. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Singh J., Dartois A., Kaur L. (2010): Starch digestibility in food matrix: a review. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 21: 168-180. Go to original source...
  13. Soral-Śmietana M., Wronkowska M. (2004): Resistant starch - nutritional and biological activity. Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, 13/54 (Special Issue 1): 51-64.
  14. Soral-Śmietana M., Wronkowska M., Biedrzycka E., Bielecka M., Ocicka K. (2005): Native and physically-modified starches - utilization of resistant starch by bifidobacteria (in vitro). Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, 14/55: 273-279.
  15. Tomomatsu H. (1994): Healthy effects of oligosaccharides. Food Technolology, 10: 61-65.
  16. Wronkowska M., Soral-Śmietana M., KomorowskaCzepirska E., Lewandowicz G. (2004): Thermal and water sorption isotherm characteristics of starch preparations with high content of resistant starch. Chapter 7. In: Yuryev V.P., Tomasik P., Ruck H. (eds): Starch: from Polysachcarides to Granules, Simple and Mixture Gels. Nova Science Publisher, Inc., New York: 105-118.
  17. Wronkowska M., Soral-Śmietana M., Krupa U., Biedrzycka E. (2006): In vitro fermentation of new modified starch preparations - changes of microstructure and bacterial end-products. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 40: 93-99. Go to original source...
  18. Wronkowska M., Soral-Śmietana M., Biedrzycka E. (2008): Utilization of resistant starch of native tapioca, corn and waxy corn starches and their retrograded preparations by Bifidobacterium. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 59: 80-87. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Yadav B.S., Sharma A., Yadav R.B. (2009): Studies of effect of multiple heating/cooling cycles on the resistant starch formation in cereals, legumes and tubers. International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition, 60: 258-272. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.