Czech J. Food Sci., 2011, 29(4):337-345 | DOI: 10.17221/217/2010-CJFS

Combined effects of temperature, pressure and low pH on the amplification of DNA of plant derived foods

Eva Bergerová, Zuzana Godálová, Peter Siekel
Department of Microbiology, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Food Research Institute, Bratislava, Slovak Republic

The effect of food processing on the DNA integrity was studied by means of PCR amplification of soybean, transgenic MON 810 and non-transgenic maize, bean, and pea. The degree of DNA degradation was checked by PCR and visualised by agarose gel electrophoresis. The conditions of technological treatment such as temperature, pH, pressure, and their combination may negatively influence the integrity of DNA in processed foods and hence PCR detection of food components. The DNA over 300 bp was amplifiable when mild processing parameters up to 100°C were performed at approximately neutral or low acidic pH. The autoclaving (12°C; 0.1 MPa) significantly reduced the size of amplifiable DNA in the time dependant manner and that was intensified by acidic pH. The maximum amplicons length achieved for highly processed matrices was 300 bp. The major impact on the DNA integrity was exerted by the combination of pressure, temperature, and low pH.

Keywords: GMO; food processing; DNA degradation; DNA amplification

Published: August 31, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Bergerová E, Godálová Z, Siekel P. Combined effects of temperature, pressure and low pH on the amplification of DNA of plant derived foods. Czech J. Food Sci. 2011;29(4):337-345. doi: 10.17221/217/2010-CJFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Aguilera M., Querci M., Balla B., Prospero A., Ermolli M., Van den Eede G. (2008): A qualitative approach for the assessment of the genetic stability of the MON 810 trait in commercial seed maize varieties. Food Analytical Methods, 1: 252-258. Go to original source...
  2. Alli I., Abdolgader R. (2000): A process for obtaining a gelling protein from defatted soybean useful in various foods, such as surimi, pressed ham, spreads and bakery products. Patent US6569484-B1.
  3. Batista R., Martins I., Jenoe P., Ricardo C.P., Oliveira M.M. (2007): A proteomic study to identify soya allergens - The human response to transgenic versus non-transgenic soya samples. International Archive of Allergy and Immunology, 144: 29-38. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Bauer T., Hammes W., Hasse N., Hertel C. (2004): Effect of food components and processing parameters on DNA degradation in food. Environmental Biosafety Research, 3: 215-223. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Buaer T., Weller P., Hammes W.P., Hertel C. (2003): The effect of processing parameters on DNA degradation in food. European Food Research and Technology, 217: 338-342. Go to original source...
  6. Bergerová E., Hrnčírová Z., Stankovská M.., Lopašovská M., Siekel P. (2010): Effect of thermal treatment on the amplification and quantification of transgenic and non-transgenic soybean and maize DNA. Food Analytical Methods. 3: 211-218. Go to original source...
  7. Brouns F. (2002): Soya isoflavones: a new and promising ingredient for the health foods sector. Food Research International, 35: 187-193. Go to original source...
  8. Debode F., Janssen E., Berben G. (2007): Physical degradation of genomic DNA of soybean flours does not impair relative quantification of its transgenic content. European Food Research and Technology, 226: 273-280. Go to original source...
  9. European Commission (2005): Event specific method for the quantification of maize GA21 using real-time PCR. Protocol [online]. Ispra: European Commission - Joint Research Centre, Institute for Health and Consumer Protection. Availabe at http://gmo-crl.jrc.it/summaries/GA21-WEB-Protocol%20Validation.pdf (accessed June 2, 2010)
  10. European Commission (2007): Commission Directive 2007/68/EC of 27 November 2007 amending Annex IIIa to Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards certain food ingredients. Official Journal of the European Union, L 310.
  11. European Commission (2009): European Commission - CRL-GMFF, JRC, Ispra, Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, Januar 2009. Event specific method for the quantification of Soybean line 40-3-2 using real-time PCR. Protocol [online]. Available at http://gmo-crl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/summaries/40-3-2_validated_Method.pdf (accessed June 2, 2010)
  12. Gryson N., Messens K., Dwettinks K. (2008): PCR detection of soy ingredients in bread. European Food Research and Technology, 227: 345-351. Go to original source...
  13. Gryson N., Ronsse F., Messens K., De Loose M., Verleyen T., Dewettinck K. (2002): Detection of DNA during the refining of soybean oil. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 79: 171-174. Go to original source...
  14. Hird H., Chisholm J., Sanchez A., Hernandez M.; Goodier R., Schneede K., Boltz C., Popping B. (2006): Effect of heat and pressure processing on DNA fragmentation and implications for the detection of meat using a real-time polymerase chain reaction. Food Additives and Contaminants, 23: 645-650. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Hrnčírová Z., Bergerová E., Siekel P. (2008): Effects of technological treatment on DNA degradation in selected food matrices of plant origin. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research, 47: 23-28.
  16. ISO 21571:2005. Foodstuffs - Methods of analysis for the detection of genetically modified organisms and derived products - Nucleic acid extraction. Geneva. International Organization for Standardization.
  17. James C. (2009): ISAAA. Brief 41: Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops. Available at http://www. isaaa.org
  18. Kollárovič G., Kretová M., Siekel P. (2005): Degradation of plant DNA by food processing. Chemické listy, 99: 255-258.
  19. Krahulcová J., Pangallo D., Piknová Ľ., Siekel P., Kuchta T. (2003): Polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Phaseolus vulgaris beans in chestnut purée. European Food Research and Technology, 217: 80-82. Go to original source...
  20. Meyer R., Chardonnes F., Hübner P., Lüthy J. (1996): Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the quality and safety assurance of food: detection of soya in processed meat products. Zeitschrift für Lebensmittel-Untersuchung und -Forschung A, 203: 339-344. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Michelini E., Simoni P., Cevenini L., Mezzanotte Z., Roda A. (2008): New trends in bioanalytical tools for the detection of genetically modified organisms: an update. Chemistry and Materials Science, 392: 355-367. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Moreano F., Busch U., Engel K.H. (2005): Distortion of genetically modified Organism's quantification in processed foods: Influence of particle size composition and heat-induced DNA degradation. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 53: 9971-9979. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Sanchez-Monge R., Lopez-Torrejon G., Pascual C.Y., Varela J., Martin-Esteban M., Salcedo G. (2004): Vicilin and convicilin are potential major allergens from pea. Clinical and Experimental Allergy, 34: 1747-1745. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Straub J.A., Hertel C., Hammes V.P. (1999): Limits of PCR-based detection method for genetically modified soya beans in wheat bread production. Zeitschrift für Lebensmittel-Untersuchung und -Forschung A, 208: 77-82. Go to original source...
  25. Štefanovičová A., Kuchta T., Siekel P. (2002): Dôkaz geneticky modifikovanej sóje v potravinách polymerázovou reťazovou reakciou. Bulletin potravinárskeho výskumu, 39: 255-264.
  26. Taylor S.L. (1997): Food from genetically modified organisms and potential for food allergy. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 4: 121-126. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Tilley M. (2004): PCR amplification of wheat sequences from DNA extracted during milling and baking. Cereal Chemistry, 81: 44-47. Go to original source...
  28. Trifa Y., Zhang D. (2004): DNA content in embryo and endosperm of maize kernel Zea mays L: Impact on GMO quantification. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 52: 1044-1048. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Yioshimura T., Kuribara H., Matsuoka T., Kodama T., Iida M., Watanebe T., Akiyama H., Maitani T., Fururi S., Hino A. (2004): Applicability of the quantification of genetically modified organisms to food processed from maize and soy. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 53: 2052-2059. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Wensing M., Knulst A.C., Piersma S., O'Kane F., Knol E.F., Koppelman S.J. (2003): Patients with anaphylaxis to pea can have peanut allergy caused by cross-reactive IgE to vicilin (Ara h 1). Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 111: 420-424. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Zoccatelli G., Pokoj S., Foetisch K., Batra J., Valero A., Del Mar San Miguel-Moncin M., Vieths S., Scheurer S. (2010): Identification and characterization of the major allergen of green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) as a non-specific lipid transfer protein (Pha v 3). Molecular Immunology, 47: 1561-1568. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.