Czech J. Food Sci., 2010, 28(2):133-138 | DOI: 10.17221/67/2009-CJFS
Reliability of PCR based screening for identification and quantification of GMOs
- 1 Department of Molecular Biology, Division of Plant Genetics, Breeding and Product Quality, Crop Research Institute, Prague-Ruzyně, Czech Republic
- 2 Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, Institute of Chemical Technology in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
Handling with genetically modified organisms (GMOs) is regulated namely in EC. Laboratories often use polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based screening methods to monitor the presence of GM particles in food commodities as a cost effective approach. The reliability was tested of such screening using 35S CaMV promoter as the target sequences. Soya grown from non-GM cultivar as declared by a seed company was investigated after the harvest, transport to the silo, and before processing. The results based on PCR and real-time PCR analysis clearly showed that, the contamination with debris of other species, dust during transport, storage, and other kind of handling led to contamination with detectable amounts of Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV). Impurities are allowed by EC regulations but may, as we have shown, interfere with the analytical procedures based on PCR. The identification of 35S CaMV promoter and NOS terminator in food with uncertain history and no approved specific events may indicate unknown GMOs and perhaps emergency situation.
Keywords: GMO (Genetically Modified Organism); identification; PCR; real-time PCR; screening; RR soya
Published: April 30, 2010 Show citation
References
- Akhond M.A.Y., Machray G.C. (2009): Biotech crops: technologies, achievements and prospects. Euphytica, 166: 47-59.
Go to original source...
- Anonymous (2008): GMO compass: http://www.gmocompass.org/eng/agri_biotechnology/gmo_planting/392.gm_maize_cultivation_europe_2008.html (Accessed 11. 3. 2009)
- Bravo A., Gill S.S., Soberon M. (2007): Mode of action of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry and Cyt toxins and their potential for insect control. Toxicon, 49: 423-435.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Chaouachi M., Chupeau G., Berapd A., McKhann H., Romaniuk M., Giancola S., Laval V., Bertheau Y., Brunel D. (2008): A High-throughput multiplex method adapted for GMO detection. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 56: 11596-11606.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Commision Regulation (EC) 1829/2003 on genetically modified (GM) food and feed. Available at http://europa.eu/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2003/l_268/l_26820031018en00010023.pdf (Accessed 11. 3. 2009)
- Commision Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 concerning the traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms and amending Directive 2001/18/EC, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/pri/en/oj/dat/2003/l_268/l_26820031018en00240028.pdf (Accessed 11. 3. 2009)
- Elenis D.S., Kalogianni D.P., Glynou K., Ioannou P.C., Christopoulos T.K. (2008): Advances in molecular techniques for the detection and quantification of genetically modified organisms. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 392: 347-354.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Fernandez S., Charles-Delobel C., Geldreich A., Berthier G., Boyer F., Collonnier C., Coué-Philippe G., Diolez A., Duplan M.N., Kebdani N., Romaniuk M., Feinberg M., Bertheau Y. (2005): Quantification of the 35S promoter in DNA extracts from genetically modified organisms using real-time polymerase chain reaction and specificity assessment on various genetically modified organisms, Part I: Operating procedure. Journal of AOAC International, 88: 547-557.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Garcia-Canas V., Cifuentes A., Gonzalez R. (2004): Detection of genetically modified organisms in foods by DNA amplification techniques. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 44: 425-436.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Haas M., Bureau M., Geldreich A., Yot P., Keller M. (2002): Cauliflower mosaic virus: still in the news. Molecular Plant Patology, 3: 419-429.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Hamels S., Glouden T., Gillard K., Mazzara M., Debode F., Foti N., Sneyers M., Nuez T.E., Pla M., Berben G., Moens W., Bertheau Y., Audeon C., Van Den Eede G., Remacle J. (2009): A PCR-microarray method for the screening of genetically modified organisms. European Food Research and Technology, 228: 531-541.
Go to original source...
- Holst-Jensen A. (2008): GMO testing - trade, labeling or safety first? Nature Biotechnology, 26: 858-859.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Holst-Jensen A., Ronning S.B., Lovseth A., Berdal K.G. (2003): PCR technology for screening and quantification of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 375: 985- 993.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Jacobsen E., Schouten H.J. (2007): Cisgenesis strongly improves introgression breeding and induced translocation breeding of plants. Trends in Biotechnology, 25: 219-223.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- James C. (2008): Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops. Brief No. 39, ISAAA SEAsiaCenter, c/o IRRI, DAPO.
- Marmiroli N., Maestri E., Gulli M., Malcevschi A., Peano C., Bordoni R., De Bellis G. (2008): Methods for detection of GMOs in food and feed. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 392: 369-384.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Michelini E., Simoni P., Cevenini L., Mezzanotte L., Roda A. (2008): New trends in bioanalytical tools for the detection of genetically modified organisms: an update. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 392: 355-367.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Morisset D., Stebih D., Cankar K., Zel J., Gruden K. (2008): Alternative DNA amplification methods to PCR and their application in GMO detection: a review. European Food Research and Technology, 227: 1287-1297.
Go to original source...
- Oraby H.A.S., Hassan A.A., Abou Mossallam A.A. (2005): Screening food products for the presence of CaMV 35S promoter and NOS 3 ' terminator. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 85: 1974- 1980.
Go to original source...
- Pietsch K., Waiblinger H.U. (2000): Quantification of genetically modified soybeans in food with the LightCycler system. In: Meuer S., Wittwer C., Nakagawara K. (eds): Rapid Cycle Real Time PCR - Methods and Applications. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg.
Go to original source...
- Reiting R., Broll H., Waiblinger H.U., Grohmann L. (2007): Collaborative study of a T-nos real-time PCR method for screening of genetically modified organisms in food products. Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit-Journal for Consumer Protection and Food Safety, 2: 116-121.
Go to original source...
- Vollenhofer S., Burg K., Schmidt J., Kroath H. (1999): Genetically modified organisms in food - Screening and specific detection by Polymerase Chain Reaction. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 47: 5038-5043.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Wolf C., Scherzinger M., Wurz A., Pauli U., Hubner P., Luthy J. (2000): Detection of cauliflower mosaic virus by the polymerase chain reaction: testing of food components for false-positive 35S-promoter screening results. European Food Research and Technology, 210: 367-372.
Go to original source...
- Yuan Z.C., Haudecoeur E., Faure D., Kerr K.F., Nester E.W. (2008): Comparative transcriptome analysis of Agrobacterium tumefaciens in response to plant signal salicylic acid, indole-3-acetic acid and gamma-amino butyric acid reveals signalling crosstalk and Agrobacterium-plant co-evolution. Cellular Microbiology, 10: 2339-2354.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Zel J., Mazzara M., Savini C., Cordeil S., Camloh M., Stebih D., Cankar K., Gruden K., Morisset D., Van Den Eede G. (2008): Method validation and quality management in the flexible scope of accreditation: An example of laboratories testing for genetically modified organisms. Food Analytical Methods, 1: 61-72.
Go to original source...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.