Czech J. Food Sci., 2008, 26(6):464-469 | DOI: 10.17221/18/2008-CJFS

Effect of lean meat proportion on the chemical composition of pork

Monika Okrouhlá, Roman Stupka, Jaroslav Čítek, Michal Šprysl, Milan Trnka, Eva Kluzáková
Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Prague-Suchdol, Czech Republic

The objective of this work was to verify the effect of the lean meat proportion on the chemical composition of the meaty parts (loin and ham) of pork. A total of 116 finishing hybrid pigs commonly used in the Czech Republic were fattened for this purpose. The pigs were divided according to the lean meat proportion criterion into 3 groups, i.e. more than 60.0%, 55.0-59.9% and 50.0-54.9%. Representative muscle samples were taken from the right halves of these pigs. They were then homogenised and submitted to chemical analysis. The results of the measuring showed that the values of the water content, intramuscular fat (IMF), crude proteins, and ash matter ranged in the loin between 72.50-72.80%, 1.56-1.96%, 23.20-23.40%, and 1.37-1.40%, respectively, and in the ham between of 70.43-71.59%, 3.52-4.26%, 21.67-21.95%, and 1.42-1.56%, respectively. The ascertained values of the water content and crude proteins with regard to the increasing lean meat proportion in the carcasses did not show any developmental tendencies. As for the content of IMF, it was determined that the higher was the lean meat proportion, the lower was the IMF content. Concerned of sensoric quality traits it means that pork meat from supermeaty hybrid pigs shows lower quality. Concerning the content of ash matter, it was observed that the ash content increased with an increasing lean meat proportion. In the carcass part of the musculus longissimus lumborum et thoracis (MLLT), it was demonstrated that the higher was the lean meat proportion, the lower was the content of amino acids - threonine, isoleucine, lysine, aspartic acid, serine, and proline. From point of the production of exceedingly meaty pigs (over 60%), it can be expected a worse nutritional pork meat value. In the carcass portion of the musculus semimembranosus (MS), the contents of valine, isoleucine, phenylalanine, lysine, serine, proline, and glycine increased with an increasing lean meat proportion. Within the framework of statistical evaluation of differences between the groups, the values of IMF ((P ≤ 0.01) in MLLT, water content, IMF, ash matter, threonine, valine, phenylalanine, lysine, aspartic acid, serine, glycine, and alanine in MS were highly significant ((P ≤ 0.05; (P ≤ 0.01 and (P ≤ 0.001).

Keywords: pig; meat; lean meat; chemical composition

Published: December 31, 2008  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Okrouhlá M, Stupka R, Čítek J, Šprysl M, Trnka M, Kluzáková E. Effect of lean meat proportion on the chemical composition of pork. Czech J. Food Sci. 2008;26(6):464-469. doi: 10.17221/18/2008-CJFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Aristoy M.C., Toldrá F. (1998): Concentration of free amino acids and dipeptides in porcine skeletal muscles with different oxidative patterns. Meat Science, 50: 327-332. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Babatude G.M., Pond W.C., Van Vlack L.D. (1966): Relationship among some physical and chemical parameters of full-versus limited-food Yorkshire pigs slaughtered at different live weights. Animal Science, 25: 526-531. Go to original source...
  3. Bahelka I., Demo P., Hanusová E., Hetényi L. (2006): Carcass value and intramuscular fat content of pig in dependence on sex and breed type. In: Book of Abstracts 57th Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production. Antalya, Turkey: 238.
  4. Belitz H.D., Grosch W., Scieberle P. (2001): Food Chemistry. 5. Auflage. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
  5. Branscheid W., Komender P., Oster A., Sack E., Fewson D. (1987): Untersuchungen zur objektiven Ermittlung des Muskelfleischanteils von Schweinehalten. Züchtungskunde, 59: 210-220.
  6. Bruwe G.G., Heinze P.H., Zondagh I.B., Naude R.T. (1991): The development of a new classification system for pig carcasses in the RSA. Porcus, 6: 27-31.
  7. Correa J.A., Faucitano L., Laforest J.P., Rivest J., Marcoux M., Gariepy C. (2006): Effects of slaughter weight on carcass composition and meat quality in pigs of two different growth rates. Journal of Animal Science, 72: 91-99. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Fewson D., Branscheid W., Sack E. (1990): Untersuchungen über das relative Wachstum der Teilstücke und Gewebe von mannlichen und weiblichen Mastschweinen verschiedenen Herkunfte. Züchtungskunde, 62: 304-316.
  9. Hovenier R., Kanis E., Van Asseldonk T., Westerink N.G. (1993): Breeding for pig meat quality in halothane negative populations - a review. Pig News and Information, 14: 17N-25N.
  10. Koucký M., Naděje B., Adamec T., Ševčíková S. (1993): The qualitative characters of carcass pigs of different sexes. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 38: 756-773.
  11. Matoušek V., Kernerová N., Václavovský J., Vejčík A. (1997): Analýza kvality masa u hybridní populace prasat. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 42: 511-515.
  12. Mikule V. (2005): Vliv intenzity šlechtění různých populací prasat na obsah intramuskulárního tuku. [Autoreferát doktorské disertační práce.] Brno: 4-17.
  13. Mora L., Sentandreu M.Á., Toldrá F. (2008): Contents of creatine, creatinine and carnosine in porcine muscles of different metabolic types. Meat Science, 79: 709-715. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Naděje B., Koucký M., Ševčíková S., Adamec T., Laštovková J. (2000): Assessment of boar and barrow meat. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 45: 539-544.
  15. Oliver M.A., Gispert M., Diestre A. (2003): The effect of breed and halothane sensitivity on pig meat quality. Meat Science, 35: 105-118. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Pulkrábek J. (2001): Provision of objective conversion into money of pigs by the system SEUROP-control mechanisms. In: Proceedings Topical Problems of Pig Rearing. ČZU, Praha, 14-20.
  17. Pulkrábek J., Wolf J., Vališ L., Vítek M., Höreth R. (2004): Vergleich verschiedener Methoden zur Bestimmung des Muskelfleischanteils im Schlachtkörper des Schweines. Züchtungskunde, 76: 6-17.
  18. SAS® Propriety Software Release 6.04, of the SAS® system for Microsoft ® Windows ®. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, 2000.
  19. Ševčíková S., Koucký M., Laštovková J. (2002): Meat performance and quality in different genotypes of F1 generation gilts. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 47: 395-400.
  20. Verbeke W., Van Oeckel M.J., Warnants N., Viaene J., Boucque C.V. (1999): Consumer perceptions, facts and possibilities to improve acceptability of health and sensory characteristics of pork. Meat Science, 53: 77-99. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Wood J.D. (2001): Meat quality and the designer pig. In: Lyons T.P., Coles D.J.A. (eds): Concepts of Meat Science. Nottingham Nutrition International, Nottingham: 17-31.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.