Czech J. Food Sci., 2007, 25(6):351-358 | DOI: 10.17221/752-CJFS

Inhibition of the in vitro growth of Salmonella enteritidis D by goat and cow milk fermented with probiotic bacteria Bifidobacterium longum Bb-46

Vedran Slačanac1, Jovica Hardi1, Darko Čuržik2, Hrvoje Pavlović1, Mirela Lučan1, Mato Vlainić3
1 Faculty of Food Technology and
2 Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia
3 Meggle - MIA, Dairy Industry, Osijek, Croatia$2

This study was carried out to determine the influence of goat and cow milk fermented by Bifidobacterium longum Bb-46 on the pathogenic Salmonella enteritidis D strain. The basic hypothesis of this study was that fermented goat milk could possibly have a stronger inhibitory effect on the growth of Salmonella enteritidis D than fermented cow milk. The correlation between the inhibitory effect and some fermentation parameters (number of viable cells of Bifidobacterium longum Bb-46 and pH of fermented milk) was also analysed. S enteritidis D strains were isolated directly from the faeces of an infant with diagnosed salmonellosis. The inhibitory effects of goat and cow milk fermented with Bifidobacterium longum Bb-46 were determined on Salmonella-Shigella agar after 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 h from the start of fermentation. Bifidobacterium longum Bb-46 count and pH values were also measured in samples of goat and cow milk during fermentation. The results obtained have shown a considerably higher inhibitory effect of fermented goat milk on the growth of Salmonella enteritidis D as compared to that of fermented cow milk. At the same time, higher acidity and CFU of Bifidobacterium longum Bb-46 were noted in fermented goat milk in all the phases of the fermentation process. The inhibitory effects of the fermented goat and cow milk on Salmonella enteritidis D growth increased rapidly with the fermentation time. The results indicated high sensitivity of Salmonella enteritidis D to acidity of both fermented milks. Consequently, a significant correlation between the inhibition degree and pH values of fermented goat and cow milk was noted.

Keywords: Bifidobacterium longum Bb-46; fermented goat milk; fermented cow milk; inhibitory effect; lactic acid fermentation; Salmonella enteritidis D

Published: December 31, 2007  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Slačanac V, Hardi J, Čuržik D, Pavlović H, Lučan M, Vlainić M. Inhibition of the in vitro growth of Salmonella enteritidis D by goat and cow milk fermented with probiotic bacteria Bifidobacterium longum Bb-46. Czech J. Food Sci. 2007;25(6):351-358. doi: 10.17221/752-CJFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Abrahamsen R.K., Rysstad G. (1991): Fermentation of goats milk with yoghurt starter bacteria: a review. Cultured Dairy Products Journal, 26: 20-31.
  2. Alichandis E., Polychroniadou A. (1997): Special features of dairy products from ewe and goat milk from the physicochemical and organoleptic point of view. Sheep Dairy News, 14: 11-18.
  3. Antunac N., Samaržija D., Lukač Havranek J. (2000): Hranidbena i terapeutska vrijednost kozjeg mlijeka. Mljekarstvo, 50: 297-304.
  4. Bernet-Camard M.-F., Lievin V., Brassart D., Neeser J.-R., Servin A.L., Hudault S. (1997): The human Lactobacillus acidophilus strain LA1 secretes a nonbacteriocin antibacterial substance(s) active in vitro and in vivo. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 63: 2747-2753. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Bickerstaffe R., Noakes D.E., Annison E.F. (1972): Quantitative aspects of fatty acid biohydrogenation, absorption and transfer into milk fat in the lactating goat, with special reference to the cis- and trans-isomers of octadecanoate and linoleate. Biochemistry Journal, 130: 607-612. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Caplan M.S., Jilling T. (2000): Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis: possible role of probiotic supplementation. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 30: 18-22. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Coconnier M.H., Lievin V., Bernet-Camard M.-F., Hudault S., Servin A.L. (1997): Antibacterial effect of the adhering human Lactobacillus acidophilus strain LB. Antimicrobial Agents in Chemotherapy, 41: 1046-1052. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. De Buck J., Van Immerseel F., Haesebrouck F., Ducatelle R. (2004): Colonization of the chicken reproductive tract and egg by Salmonella. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 97: 233-245. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Duraković S. (1996): Primjenjena mikrobiologija. Prehrambeno tehnološki inženjering, Zagreb, Croatia.
  10. Gismondo M.R., Drago L., Lombardi A. (1999): Review of probiotics available to modify gastrointestinal microflora. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 12: 287-292. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Haenlein G.F.W. (2004): Goat milk in human nutrition. Small Ruminant Research, 51: 155-163. Go to original source...
  12. Holzapfel W.H., Haberer P., Snel J., Schillinger U., Huis Int Veld J.H.J. (1998): Overview of gut flora and probiotics. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 41: 85-101. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Juarez M., Ramos M. (1986): Physico chemical characteristic of goats milk as distinct from those cow milk. In: Bulletin IDF, Sesion II: 54-65.
  14. Loewenstein M., Speck S.J., Barnhart H.M., Frank J.F. (1980): Research on goat milk products: A review. Journal of Dairy Science, 63: 1631-1648. Go to original source...
  15. Mehaia M.A. (1995): The fat globule size distribution in camel, goat, ewe and cow milk. Milchwissenschaft, 50: 260-269.
  16. Misra A., Kulia R. (1994): Use of Bifidobacterium bifidum for the manufacturing of bio-yoghurt and fruit bio-yoghurt. Journal of Dairy Science, 47: 192-197.
  17. Niku-Paavola M.-L., Latva-Kala K., Laitila A., Mattila-Sandholm T., Haikara A. (1999): New types of antimicrobial compounds produced by Lactobacillus plantarum. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 86: 29-35. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Ouwehand A.C., Kirjavainen P.V., Shortt C., Salminen S. (1999): Probiotics: mechanisms and established effects. International Dairy Journal, 9: 43-52. Go to original source...
  19. Park Y.W. (1991): Relative buffering capacity of goat milk, cow milk, soy-based infant formulas, and commercial nonpresciption antacid drugs. Journal of Dairy Science, 74: 26-33. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Park Y.W. (1994a): Hypo-allergenic and therapeutic significance of goat milk. Small Ruminant Research, 14: 151-159. Go to original source...
  21. Park Y.W. (1994b): Nutrient and mineral composition of commercial US goat milk yoghurts. Small Ruminant Research, 13: 67-70. Go to original source...
  22. Pavlović H., Hardi J., Slačanac V., Halt M., Kocevski D. (2006): Inhibitory effect of goat and cow milk fermented by Bifidobacterium longum on Serratia marcescens and Campylobacter jejuni. Czech Journal of Food Sciences, 24: 164-171. Go to original source...
  23. Prescott L.M., Harley J.P., Klein D.A. (eds) (1996): Microbiology. 3rd Ed. Wm. C. Brown Publ., Chicago: 967-985.
  24. Saarela M., Mogensen G., Fonden R., Matto J., Mattilla-Sandholm T. (2000): Probiotic bacteria: safety, functional and technological properties. Journal of Biotechnology, 84: 197-215. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Shelley A.W., Deeth H.C., Macrae I.C. (1987): A numerical taxonomic study of psychotropic bacteria associated with lipolytic spoilage of raw milk. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 62: 123-137. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Slačanac V., Hardi J., Pavlović H., Vuković D., Čutić V. (2004): Inhibitory effect of goat and cow milk fermented by ABT-2 culture (Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5, Bifidobacterium lactis Bb-12 and Streptococcus thermophilus) on the growth of some uropathogenic E. coli strains. Italian Journal of Food Science, 16: 227-237.
  27. Slačanac V., Hardi J., Čuržik D., Pavlović H., Jukić M. (2005): Production of antibacterial organic acids during the fermentation of goat and cow milk with Bifidobacterium longum Bb-46. Acta Alimentaria, 34: 277-285. Go to original source...
  28. Tamime A.Y., Marshall V.M.E., Robinson R.K. (1995): Microbiological and technological aspects of milks fermented by bifidobacteria. Journal of Dairy Research, 62: 151-187. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Tamime A.Y., Marshall V.M.E. (1997): Microbiology and technology of fermented milks. In: Law B.A. (ed.): Microbiology and Biochemistry of Cheese and Fermented Milk. Chapman & Hall, London: 57-123. Go to original source...
  30. Tuomola E.M., Ouwehand A.C., Salminen S.J. (1999): The effect of probiotic bacteria on the adhesion of pathogens to human intestinal mucus. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology, 26: 137-142. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Zapico P., Gaya P., De Paz M., Nunez M., Medina M. (1991): Influence of breed, animal, and days of lactation on lactoperoxidase system components in goat milk. Journal of Dairy Science, 74: 783-792. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.