Czech J. Food Sci., 2001, 19(5):196-200 | DOI: 10.17221/6607-CJFS

Determination of astringent taste in model solutions and in beverages

H. Valentová, S. ©krovánková, Z. Panovská, J. Pokorný
Institute of Chemical Technology - Department of Food Chemistry and Analysis, Prague, Czech Republic

The astringent taste is important for the sensory quality of beverages. Perception thresholds of two important astringent compounds - tannic acid and (+)-catechin were determined using two procedures. The concentration-intensity dependence was linear at low concentrations and up to medium intensities of the astringent taste if unstructured graphical scales were used, but the saturation threshold was soon attained in the case of tannic acid. Recording the results on printed forms gave similar results as using a touch-sensitive monitor. The optimum tasting was achieved at swallowing after degustation of 5 s. The duration of degustation increased the intensity. The astringent flavour was suppressed by sugar, but was not significantly influenced by ethanol, citric acid or quinine hydrochloride. Astringent substances were accurately perceived and rated in wine, tea infusion and orange drink, but the increase of astringency was smaller than in model solutions. The astringent taste was easily distinguished from the bitter taste.

Keywords: astringency; catechin; orange juice; tannic acid; tea brew; wine

Published: October 31, 2001  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Valentová H, ©krovánková S, Panovská Z, Pokorný J. Determination of astringent taste in model solutions and in beverages. Czech J. Food Sci. 2001;19(5):196-200. doi: 10.17221/6607-CJFS.
Download citation

References

  1. A RNOLD G.M. (1983): A tasting procedure for assessing bitterness and astringency. In: WILLIAMS A.A., ATKINS R.K. (Eds.): Sensory Quality of Food and Beverages. Chichester, Ellis Horwood: 109–114.
  2. C IVILLE G.V., LAWLESS H.T. (1986): The importance of language in describing perceptions. J. Sensory Stud., 1: 203– 215. Go to original source...
  3. D ING Z., KUHR S., ENGELHARDT U.H. (1992): Influence of catechins and theaflavins on the astringent taste of black tea brews. Z. Lebensmittel-Untersuch. Fors., 195: 108–111. Go to original source...
  4. FISCHER U., NOBLE A.C. (1994): The effect of ethanol, catechin concentration and pH on sourness and bitterness of wine. Amer. J. Enol. Viticult., 45: 6–10. Go to original source...
  5. G RIFFITHS N.M. (1993): Sensory evaluation of taint. Assessing Food Qual., 2: 21.
  6. G UINARD J.-X., PANGBORN R.M., LEWIS M.J. (1986a): The time-course of astringency in wine upon repeated ingestion. Amer. J. Enol. Viticult., 37: 184–189. Go to original source...
  7. G UINARD J.-X., PANGBORN R.M., LEWIS M.J. (1986b): Preliminary studies on acidity-astringency interactions in model solutions and wines. J. Sci. Food Agric., 37: 811–817. Go to original source...
  8. HASLAM E., LILLEY T.H. (1988): Natural astringency in foodstuffs – a molecular interpretation. CRC Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 27: 1–40. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. H OPPE K. (1984): Beiträge zu Psychophysik des Süßgeschmacks. 4. Methodischer Nachtrag zum Einfluß der Versuchsanordnung und des Spülregimes bei Differenzprüfungen. Nahrung, 28: 983–995. Go to original source...
  10. K RETSCHMER K.F. (1992): Auswertung der Tannoidergebnisse. Brauwelt, 132: 1855–1858.
  11. LAWLESS H.T. (1979): Evidence of neural inhibition in bittersweet taste mixtures. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 93: 538. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. LAWLESS H.T. (1986): Sensory interactions in mixtures. J. Sensory Stud., 1, 259–274. Go to original source...
  13. LEE C.B., LAWLESS H.T. (1991): Time-course of astringent sensations. Chem. Senses, 16: 225–238. Go to original source...
  14. LYMAN B.J., GREEN B.G. (1990): Oral astringency: effects of repeated exposure and interactions with sweetness. Chem. Senses, 15: 151–164. Go to original source...
  15. MCB RIDE R.L. (1985): Sensory measurement: an introductory overview. CSIRO Food Res. Quart., 45: 59–63.
  16. MEILGAARD D.M., CIVILLE G.V., CARR B.T. (1987): Sensory Evaluation Techniques. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press.
  17. OWUOR P.O., REEVES S.G., WANYOKO J.K. (1986): Correlation of theaflavins content and evaluations of Kenyan black teas. J. Sci. Food Agric., 37: 507–513. Go to original source...
  18. POKORNÝ J., GIANG L. K., ŠOURAÈOVÁ M., DAVÍDEK J. (1987): Effect of tannins of tea leaves on the astringency of tea infusions. Sbor. VŠCHT v Praze, E, 61: 115–134.
  19. ROBICHAUD J.L., NOBLE A.C. (1990): Astringency and bitterness of selected phenolics in wine. J. Sci. Food Agric., 53: 343–353. Go to original source...
  20. SINGLETON V.L. (1974): Analytical fractionation of phenolic substances of grapes and wine and some practical uses of such analyses. In: WEBB A.D. (Ed.): Chemistry of Winemaking. Washington, DC, Amer. Chem. Soc.: 184–211. Go to original source...
  21. SINGLETON V.L., NOBLE A.C. (1976): Wine flavor and phenolic substances. In: CHARALAMBOUS G., KATZ I. (Eds.): Phenolic, Sulfur, and Nitrogen Compounds in Food Flavors. Washington, DC, Amer. Chem. Soc.: 47–70. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.